Latest News Archives
Forget the assumption that women are the biggest gossips – a new survey out today concludes men are by far the worst culprits.
One in 10 men like to dish the dirt on other people, compared with 4% of women, while more men than women are guilty of spreading rumours, according to the poll.
Some 55% of men said they gossiped at work, compared with 46% of women whose top topics were family feuds, followed by the latest storyline in EastEnders, old school friends, fashion errors and what neighbours are like.
Among men the favourite subject is old school friends, then the sexiest girl at work, promotions, salaries, and finally their best friend’s conquest, the survey found.
At home, 17% of men confess they were more interested in pillow talk than sex, with only 10% of women saying the same. However, a fifth of girlfriends and wives said they preferred to gossip with a mate than their partner.
The poll of 1,033 adults conducted last month across the country.
It was carried out by BMRB Research on behalf of BT’s new Buzz-In facility, which allows up to 20 people to talk with one another on the same line at the same time.
David Sales, director of BT Conferencing, said: “Our research shows that, as a nation, we’re fascinated with gossip, whether it’s about work, our love lives or the latest soap.
“Yet it’s men who are more likely to gossip the day away, dispelling the myth that women are the only ones who like to spend hours chin wagging.”
A Cancer Research UK study shows that the potential benefits of a national cervical cancer screening programme for women under the age of 25 are outweighed by the harms, according to
The research team revealed that inviting 100,000 women aged 20-24 for a smear test would prevent up to 23 cervical cancers overall. When they excluded very early stage cancers, where the treatment is often the same as for pre-cancers, routine screening prevented between three and nine invasive cancers from developing. But this would also mean an estimated 3,000 young women would be treated unnecessarily.
Screening picks up changes in the cervix which – in younger women – almost always return to normal without treatment. Screening under 25s means many would be treated unnecessarily for changes which would not have caused any harm if they had been left alone. And treatment brings side effects which, for a minority of women, include a risk of serious bleeding and increasing the chance of premature birth in later pregnancies.
The researchers estimated that to prevent one cancer from developing, the NHS would need to perform between 12,500 and 40,000 additional smear tests on women aged 20-24 and treat between 300 and 900 women in that age group.
Professor Peter Sasieni, Cancer Research UK’s cervical screening expert at Queen Mary University of London, said: “This research quantifies the risks and potential benefits of providing smear tests routinely in women under the age of 25. It seems clear that the risks outweigh the benefits. Decisions about screening programmes and who to invite should be based on careful analysis and it’s important to target screening at the right age group for the best possible outcome.
“Cervical screening is a very effective way of preventing cervical cancer in women over the age of 25. Our study shows that screening younger women leads to unnecessary treatment for many, resulting in serious side effects for some.
“This research makes it clear that the policy change to stop cervical screening in women aged 20-24 in England was well justified from a health perspective and was not a cost-cutting exercise.”
In England around 1,900 cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed each year in women aged 25-64. Since the cervical screening programme was introduced in 1988, cervical cancer incidence rates in England have dropped by more than 40 per centfrom 4,100 cases in 1988 to 2,300 in 2010.
Dr Julie Sharp, Cancer Research UK’s head of health information, said: “Whatever your age and whether or not you’ve had a smear test, it’s important to go to your GP if you notice anything out of the ordinary, like bleeding after the menopause, in between periods or after sex or pain during sex . It probably won’t be cancer but it’s a good idea to get checked out by your doctor who can arrange any necessary diagnostic tests.”
Dr Karen Kennedy, NCRI director, said: “This important research will help inform public health policy to provide the most effective programmes to save lives from cancer.”
How does military service affect women? As it turns out, researchers don’t exactly know the answers to this question, and that’s why some of them recently formed a new collaborative,
The group, known as the Consortium on the Health and Readiness of Servicewomen (CHARS), comprises more than 30 private and public researchers from the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) in San Diego as well as from academia, the government and private institutions. Their areas of expertise include epidemiology, neurocognitive psychology, nursing and family studies.
“Understanding the unique concerns that impact only women or issues that impact both men and women in different ways is really important if you want to maintain a ready force,” said NHRC research psychologist Stephanie McWhorter in a statement. “Our hope is to produce useful information that military leadership and civilian policymakers can use to establish best practices in the prevention, intervention and screening of health issues.”
In a recent article in Naval Medical Research and Development News, the consortium was described as timely given new military policies that directly affect female service members, including the end of a ban on ground combat roles for women and the extension of benefits to same-sex spouses.
The consortium members have experience in research where gender can play an important role, such as suicidal behavior in men and women; differences in coping with stress; biological and genetic risk factors associated with post-traumatic stress disorder; and the effects of deployment on military families.
CHARS is not the first project of its kind; other efforts like the Women’s Health Task Force and the Defense Women’s Health Research Program have focused on similar research. CHARS, however, is meant to spotlight existing research and bring researchers together to work on new studies.
“We want to encourage people to engage in more collaborative, multi-disciplinary research so we can produce findings that can help the Defense Department,” McWhorter said.
Scientist from the University of Oxford and Churchill Hospital in the United Kingdom have discovered that women with larger than average butts are not only increasingly intelligent, but also
The results found that people who carry their body fat in their thighs and backsides aren’t just carrying extra weight, but also some extra protection against diabetes, heart disease and other conditions associated with obesity.
Like Us on Facebook
“It is the protective role of lower body, that is [thigh and backside] fat, that is striking,” the researchers said in a statement. “The protective properties of the lower body fat depot have been confirmed in many studies conducted in subjects with a wide range of age, BMI and co-morbidities.”
According to ABC News, the results found women with bigger backsides tend to have lower levels of cholesterol and are more likely to produce hormones to metabolize sugar. Having a big butt requires an excess of Omega 3 fats, which have been proven to catalyze brain development, Elite Daily reported.
Researchers also found the children born to women with wider hips are intellectually superior to the children of slimmer, less curvy mothers.
Researchers analyzed and compared female belly fat with the legs, hips and buttocks, finding that the fat from the lower body of women prevents the development of diabetes, thanks to the quantity and type containing hormones, Eyeonthenut reported.
“If you’re going to have fat, you’re definitely better off if you’ve got some fat in the lower body,” Dr. Michael Jensen, director of endocrine research at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. told ABC News. “If you look at people who have primarily the pear shape, they’re healthy in all the ways that this fat behaves. It’s not just less heart attacks or less diabetes, it’s all these ways we think about fat as an important organ for our health.”
The fat located in the thigh and backside produce hormones that help to better metabolize sugars and other lipids, abdominal fat secretes hormones with the opposite effect.
According to ABC News, experts said it’s unclear if the fat in the thighs and backside are better for you than simply being thin.
“If you’re a healthy thin weight, you’re going to be every bit as healthy as someone who has weight, but has all the weight in the lower body,” Jensen said.
Source : universityherald.com
A new research from McMaster University suggests women can remember faces much better
Pasta, fatty red meat and soda have all been linked to an increased risk for depression among women, indicates research published in the journal Brain, Behavior and Immunity.
According to the report, the inflammation caused by these foods is now being indicated in
Diet, inflammation and depression
Researchers headed up by study coauthor Michel Lucas, PhD, of the the Harvard School of Public Health, indicate the link between pasta, fatty red meat, soda and depression is not entirely clear, but more and more evidence suggests diet plays a significant role in depression risk as a direct result of inflammation.
This is not the first research project to link food to symptoms of depression, though it is the most complete.
In September 2013, research conducted at the University of Eastern Finland found a healthy diet was associated with a decreased depression risk in men.
“The study reinforces the hypothesis that a healthy diet has potential not only in the warding off of depression, but also in its prevention,” Anu Ruusunen, MSc, who presented the September results in her doctoral thesis in the field of nutritional epidemiology, told Live Science.
In her study, Ruusunen found a diet high in folate, consisting primarily of berries, vegetables, whole grains, lean meat and liver was consistently linked to lower depression risk.
On the contrary, a diet high in sausages, processed meats, sugar-containing desserts and snacks, sugary drinks, manufactured foods, French rolls and baked or processed potatoes was linked to an increased risk of depression in men.
Depression in women
The Mediterranean diet is considered a well-balanced and healthy meal program. (Shutterstock)
The results of Ruusunen’s research are supported by the most recent findings in women.
Out of a test pool of more than 40,000 females who had no sign of clinical depression at the start of the research, those who sipped soda, ate fatty red meat, or consumed refined grains (like pasta, white bread, crackers, or chips) on a daily basis were 29 to 41 percent more likely to be diagnosed or treated for depression than women in the study who ate healthier.
What’s more, women in the high risk group for depression tested the highest for the three blood biomarkers associated with inflammation.
This correlation between inflammation, food and depression is significant because previous research has classified depression as an inflammatory disease, but the cause of such inflammation has remained mysterious.
Experts indicate there are more complex, emotional and psychological factors at work in most cases of depression; however, the role inflammation plays in the body may offer a means to treat and help prevent this disease.
“We now know that depression is associated with a chronic, low-grade inflammatory response and activation of cell-mediated immunity, as well as activation of the compensatory anti-inflammatory reflex system,” wrote researchers in a a study published in BMC Medical. “It is similarly accompanied by increased oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS), which contribute to neuroprogression in the disorder.”
And just as certain foods were found to contribute to depression in women, the most recent study found coffee, olive oil, wine, and vegetables including carrots, sweet potatoes, and leafy greens consumed on a daily basis helped keep depression at bay.
These depression-fighting foods are considered components of the Mediterranean diet, a highly recommended, balanced nutrition plan.
By Heather Yourex Health Reporter
CALGARY – Susan Ockey has been practicing yoga for nearly 5 years. She started her practice after her cancer treatment finished.
According to clinical psychological, Dr. Linda Carlson, many cancer survivors experience stress and anxiety long after therapy ends.
Carlson is the co-author of new research that has found yoga and meditation can be more effective than group therapy in helping breast cancer survivors cope with the stress and anxiety that follow treatment.
The study, the largest trial of its kind , followed 271 breast cancer survivors in Alberta and BC.
“This was the first study to compare the mindfulness group with another active treatment and we actually found it was better for producing a number of different outcomes and helping with symptoms.”
Ockey was one of the study’s early participants. Several years later, meditation and yoga has become a regular part of her routine.
“I learned so many tools about how to deal with stress and how to notice the trigger points in when you are getting stress so you recognize before you’re wound up like a rubber band.”
The study was recently published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The phrase “eyes up here” usually applies to some dude who can’t make eye contact with a woman because he’s too focused on her chest. Researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln found out that that phrase could and should apply to ladies too, because the women they studied stared at other women’s breasts just as much as the men did.
“When asked to focus on a woman’s appearance, study participants … quickly moved their eyes to and then dwelled on a woman’s breasts and other sexualized body parts,” the Nebraska researchers wrote in their release. They explain
Essentially, women are every bit as boob-centric as their male counterparts when it comes to surveying the appearance of a woman. ”We do have a slightly different pattern for men than women, but when we looked at their overall dwell times – how long they focused on each body part – we find the exact same effects for both groups,” Sarah Gervais, an assistant professor of psychology at the school, said.
The difference is what those stares mean. Gervais says that women do it for “social comparison” while men tend to use those stares to form an opinion. “[M]ale participants regarded the curvaceous women more positively than women with fewer curves, whereas female participants viewed these women similarly,” the researchers explain. So, men tend to use their breast reconnaissance surveys to judge women. Gervais and company add:
Even when study instructions encouraged the participants to focus on the personality of the female target – a manipulation that would seem likely to lead to additional focus on the images’ faces – women with hourglass figures were perceived more positively than women with straighter figures by male participants …
In short, hetero guys, just because women stare like you do, you’re not off the hook.
Source: The Atlantic Wire